Friday, February 5, 2010

Music dowloading copyright issues


Net piracy fight takes body blow
ASHER MOSES
February 5, 2010



HOLLYWOOD studios and record labels are being forced to go back to the drawing board to come up with a new way of combating online piracy after the Federal Court ruled that internet service providers are not required to police copyright infringement on their networks.

The music industry says it may have no choice but to sue individuals for illegal file sharing unless the federal government intervenes with a solution to its piracy woes.

All the major film studios sued iiNet in an effort to force the internet service provider to warn and even disconnect customers who repeatedly download movies illegally.

It was the first case of its kind in the world and the first time an Australian trial had been covered live on Twitter.

In a landmark judgment handed down yesterday morning, Justice Dennis Cowdroy rejected the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft's claim that iiNet ''authorised'' its customers' copyright infringement by failing to act on thousands of infringement notices sent to it by AFACT.

Justice Cowdroy found iiNet had done no more than provide an internet service to its users. He said iiNet did not have control over its customers' use of the BitTorrentfile-sharing software, which customers used to infringe the studios' copyright.

He said: ''iiNet is not responsible if an iiNet user uses that system to bring about copyright infringement … the law recognises no positive obligation on any person to protect the copyright of another.''

Tony Joyner, a partner in the technology and IT group at law firm Freehills, said he was particularly interested in the government's response because the online piracy issues raised by the studios at the trial remained a ''very big and real problem''.

''Everything iiNet says is rational,'' he said. ''They're saying we're just a simple conduit and if people are doing bad things it's not up to us to be the police. The studios are also being very rational and saying it's happening on your turf, so we need you to do something.''

The case, while brought by the film studios, also has a big impact on the music industry, which was hoping for a precedent it could use to force ISPs to co-operate on reducing online piracy. Sabiene Heindl, general manager of the music industry's anti-piracy arm, Music Industry Piracy Investigations, said: ''Today's Federal Court decision suggests that copyright owners broadly may have no choice but to sue individuals for illegal file-sharing. This would be a most unfortunate outcome.''

AFACT executive director Neil Gane said he had 21 days to decide whether to appeal. The studios would now increase their lobbying of the government to change the law to force ISPs to be liable for the downloading habits of customers.

''We are confident that the government will not support a policy outcome which allows for the copyright infringement to continue unabated,'' he said.

Freehills' Mr Joyner said: ''I think the only way there won't be a legislative response is if … an appeal will occur and has some chance of succeeding relatively quickly.''

In July last year, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said he was awaiting the outcome of the iiNet case before deciding whether there was a need for legislative change. Yesterday, his spokeswoman said the government would examine the decision before making any further comment.

Senator Conroy had appeared to be on the side of the studios, saying at a conference in April last year that iiNet's defence in the case ''belongs in a Yes Minister episode''.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Google tablet


Google tablet to give Apple a touch of its own medicine
ASHER MOSES
February 3, 2010 - 12:15PM



Google's design for a new tablet computer is based on its Chrome operating system and would directly rival the iPad.

Google is trying to one-up Apple, showing off designs for a new tablet computer based on its Chrome operating system that would be a direct rival to the iPad.

Just weeks after launching its own iPhone competitor in the US, the Nexus One, Google might soon extend its competition with Apple further as it seeks to push its search and other products on to as many devices as possible.

Google's user interface designer, Glen Murphy, published mock-ups of a Google tablet on the search giant's Chromium.org website, along with a video of how users would interact with the device.
Google's mockup designs for a Chrome OS-powered tablet computer. Click for more photos

Late last year Google announced Chrome OS, an operating system predominantly for small netbooks that would be based around the web browser, providing quick boot times and easy access to Google's array of online services.

The first Chrome OS netbooks are due to arrive this year, but Google is now considering extending the platform to other devices including tablets, desktops and even big screen TVs.

Chrome OS is a separate project to Google's Android platform for smartphones.

Google's tablet video shows the user interacting with the multi-touch touchscreen in a similar way to the iPad, using similar gestures to resize and interact with windows and launch applications. The device would include a five- to 10-inch screen and an on-screen keyboard.

On his blog, Murphy published an image showing the full range of hand gestures that would be supported by the tablet.

Google chief executive officer Eric Schmidt was on the board of Apple until August last year, when he resigned citing a conflict of interest over its Android phone platform and Chrome OS.

Now, the companies are increasingly at each other's throats.

Apple chief executive officer Steve Jobs reportedly told staff at a recent "Town Hall" meeting that Google was the one that began competing with Apple by entering the phone industry, labelling the company's "Don't be evil" corporate mantra "a load of crap".

Earlier, Google released an unofficial, browser-based version of its Google Voice app for the iPhone, which allows users to make cheap mobile calls using the internet. This effectively bypassed Apple, which had previously declined to allow Google Voice to be included in its App Store.

Microsoft has unsuccessfully tried to push tablet computers for the past decade, to no avail, perhaps because its designs were bulky and resembled regular laptops. The main difference was that the screens were touch-sensitive and could swivel to lie flat in a slate format.

But Microsoft also sees potential in the new iPad-style, multi-touch tablets, with some gadget sites late last year publishing images of a Microsoft "Courier" prototype. The images suggested it would include two touch screens that face each other in a book format.

Other manufacturers - including HP, Lenovo and Dell - are planning to launch tablet computers based on the Windows 7, Linux and Google Android operating systems.

TechCrunch reported today that, according to anonymous sources, Apple is working on a larger version of the iPad that would function more like a Mac than an iPhone.

Gartner analyst Robin Simpson said other companies including Google would have trouble competing with Apple's iPad because Apple had already developed a strong ecosystem around its products, allowing users to buy content from iTunes with one click.

"You can make great hardware, you can have a fantastic, easy-to-use operating system, but to make it commercially successful I think you need an ecosystem that encourages lots and lots of independent third party development and makes it really easy for users to discover content and buy content," Simpson said in a phone interview.

"It's easy to do hardware, it's really hard to create an ecosystem and Apple's got a head-start on everybody because they've been doing this for four to five years, based around iTunes."

Google would not say when or if it would start selling a tablet, saying, "Chrome OS is still in development and we are constantly experimenting with various user interfaces to determine what designs would produce the best user experience."

The tablet models would compete heavily with netbooks, which are small, lightweight laptops designed for accessing the web, editing documents or working on email while on the go.

To differentiate netbooks from the tablet competitors, PC makers are adding significantly more grunt to their netbook offerings, to such an extent that it's difficult to describe them as netbooks.

Dell today launched its Alienware M11x, which is an ultra-portable laptop with an 11-inch screen but includes a top-of-the-line graphics chip and processor. Dell described the machine as "the fastest sub-12 inch laptop in the universe".

Source: smh.com.au

Controversial or not?!

Wikileaks shuts down, unable to plug funding gap
ASHER MOSES
February 2, 2010 - 12:08PM

Comments 6
Shining a light in murky places ... Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

Shining a light in murky places ... Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Photo: Esther Dyson / Flickr

The anonymous whistleblower website Wikileaks, which has been a thorn in the side of governments and big business for three years, has shut down temporarily because it has run out of money.

The document repository, founded by an Australian living in East Africa, has been the catalyst for countless front-page stories around the world.

It has exposed serious business and political corruption and sparked a political scandal in Australia when it published the federal government's secret blacklist of banned websites.

In a message posted on the site, founder Julian Assange appealed for donations from the public, saying he had received hundreds of thousands of pages relating to "corrupt banks, the US detainee system, the Iraq war, China, the UN and many others" but did not have the resources to release them.

The site, which claims to be non-profit and does not accept donations from governments or corporations, costs about $US600,000 ($678,000) a year to run, including staff.

But so far only $US130,000 has been raised for this year.

"Even $10 will pay to put one of these reports into another 10,000 hands and $1000, a million," Assange wrote.

Wikileaks has an impressive track record of exposing corruption, revealing public interest information and keeping organisations honest.

It has published millions of documents and, says the BBC, has fought off more than 100 legal challenges and won awards from the Economist and Amnesty International.

"One of the reasons why Wikileaks is so useful is that it's able to put original documents up - unfiltered by comment and editorial," Julian Petley, chairman of the British Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, said.

In Australia, it caused a major stir in March last year when it published the Australian Communications and Media Authority's blacklist of websites that would be banned under the federal government's internet filtering policy.

The leak confirmed that the blacklist targeted not just nasty sites but a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even that of a Queensland dentist.

Soon after its launch, in August 2007, a document obtained by Wikileaks was used as the primary source for a front-page story in The Guardian about corruption surrounding former Kenyan leader Daniel arap Moi.

The site was taken offline in early 2008 after Swiss bank Julius Baer launched legal action to prevent the spread of documents alleging tax and money laundering schemes involving Cayman Islands accounts. The bank dropped the case within a month after a significant public outcry.

Wikileaks was the subject of another injunction late last year when it published a controversial report implicating commodities giant Trafigura in a toxic chemical dumping incident in the Ivory Coast.

It has also published the US Army's operations manual for the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, leaked emails from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin's private Yahoo email account, high-level Scientology documents and the membership list for the far-right British National Party.

In September last year, Wikileaks posted email correspondence between scientists in the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia, which was seized on by climate sceptics around the world to suggest that the threat of climate change was being overinflated.

In November, the site released more than half a million US pager messages covering a 24-hour period on the day of the attacks on New York and Washington on September 11, 2001.

Media organisations including The Guardian and The Spectator, which have benefited greatly from Wikileaks, have run editorials urging people to donate to the site.

A "Save Wikileaks" group on Facebook has just under 1300 members.

Source: smh.com.au

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Holiday over- Apple r @ it again

Apple is set to unveil its new tablet computer, keenly watched by gadget-obsessed consumers, envious competitors and eager content partners.

The new touch-screen device will be modelled - physically and functionally - on the three-year-old iPhone.

And just like the iPhone and the iPod before it, the device will be part of an integrated ''ecosystem'' of services tipped to include functions and content for the education sector, digital books, newspapers and magazines.
The anticipated Apple tablet is said to be modelled on the iPhone.

''Met its match with a rolling pin'' ... the anticipated Apple tablet is said to be modelled on the iPhone.

The tablet, to be named the iPad, iTablet, iSlate, iCanvas or iBook, will inherit the gaming, music and video capabilities available on the iPhone and some of the newer iPods.

Michael Arrington, an influential Silicon Valley technology blogger, has quoted Apple's co-founder and chief executive, Steve Jobs, as calling the tablet ''the most important thing I've ever done''.

That has led pundits to believe Apple's announcement in San Francisco today will put emphasis on the tablet's uses in education. Apple has a long history in the education market, beginning with its earliest computers in the late 1970s. More recently the iPod Touch has been used for learning programs in schools and universities.

“The most significant thing about the announcement will not be the device itself, but the new ecosystem that Apple will announce regarding e-book and entertainment titles, especially by the major education publishers,” said Philip Cookson, a former Apple manager who now runs the Melbourne-based consultancy, Philology.

Apple has also been working with select software developers and content partners to develop a small suite of applications which will be showcased at Wednesday’s event.

One of the companies reported to be among the launch partners is the publishing house Conde Nast. The publisher of The New Yorker and Vogue has already begun selling its GQ men's magazine as a download for the iPhone and iPod Touch.

The download, which sells for $3.99 in Australia, contains photographs and articles from the physical publication plus extras such as videos.

Other print content partners could include The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal - both of which have signalled that they are to lock most of their content behind a pay wall and charge readers to access their content.

News Corp’s book publishing arm, HarperCollins is another company mooted to have been talking to Apple about making its books available on the tablet.

According to the blog AppleInsider, the device looks like an iPhone that has ''met its match with a rolling pin''. As well as wireless connectivity, the tablet is almost certain to be configured to use the latest high-speed mobile networks.

Cookson, who has been closely following developments, believes that the device will come in one size, a 25-centimetre screen, and that it will cost between $US700 and $US800, depending on the options.

Wednesday’s launch is just a show and tell session. The device is not expected to go on sale until at least March.

Apple places a high premium on design and it will have almost certainly been led by Jonathon Ive, the British-born designer guru behind most of Apple’s products, including the iPod and the iPhone.

He and his boss have an aversion to buttons, cable ports and switches and the tablet is expect to boast the same svelte look and minimalism that is found in other products in Apple’s stable.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Merry Xmas & Happy New Year to All


Connecting at Christmas the high-tech wayASHER MOSES
December 23, 2009 - 1:57PM

The Brisbane-based members of the Dobinson family gather for their trans-continental Christmas feast. Photo: Paul Broben

..Three generations of the Dobinson family gathered around a table for a Christmas feast this morning for the first time ever, a remarkable feat considering they were spread out across three cities around the world.

The tyranny of distance was bridged thanks to state-of-the-art video conferencing technology that has typically been the preserve of high-flying executives but will soon begin making inroads into the home.

Far removed from the traditional Skype home video conferencing experience - which is low quality and requires users to gather around a tiny computer screen - the Cisco TelePresence system uses large screens and high-definition (HD) cameras to create the impression that all participants are sitting in the same room together.

The Dobinson family, based in Sydney, Brisbane and the US, won Cisco's "Christmas Connections" competition, which asked families to submit their stories for the chance to connect using TelePresence.

The three eldest sisters - Claire (83), Athlone (80) and Sonia (73) - have been separated since just after World War II, when Claire emigrated to the US.

The younger sisters have only seen Claire twice in the intervening years and with their health in decline, an in-person Christmas reunion would have been all but impossible.

But this morning, about 20 family members in Sydney, Brisbane and the US city Herndon, which is just outside Washington D.C., gathered virtually around the same table for a Christmas feast that none of them will forget in a hurry.

"You can talk on email and you can talk on the phone but to actually see people and interact immediately was the most special bit," said Danelle Dobinson, 56, who is Athlone's daughter.

"It was quite funny because it was just like a crazy Christmas dinner anyway, with everyone talking over the top of everybody else and vying for attention and trying to get their message out.

"We had to call for order at one stage."

The event was bitter sweet for the family because it may be the last time they see Claire, who is seriously ill.

"It was especially hard because we weren't sure how she [Claire] would be health-wise and as it turned out she couldn't talk to us and was sleeping most of the time, but we did get to see her," Danelle said.

Cisco TelePresence systems cost between $20,000 and several hundred thousand dollars a piece, far out of reach for most punters. They have been adopted by over 350 organisations around the globe, including ANZ, Telstra and the Federal Government in Australia.

But Peter Hughes, the general manager of Cisco's collaboration business, said versions for the consumer market would be launched within around a year.

"Between Sydney and London or Sydney and New York there is no perceived delay or latency on the call at all," he said.

Already, companies including Microsoft and Logitech sell consumer webcams that attach to PCs and are capable of delivering HD audio and video.

But Hughes said Cisco's systems would be designed to connect up to the big screen TVs in living rooms.

He said consumers were now recording a lot of their video memories in HD using the latest gadgets, and would soon expect to get the same experience from real-time online chat.

"We believe that video is going to really, truly scale human interaction and the capabilities that we have with the technology today mean that it's as good as being there," he said.

Source: smh.com.au

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Webwilly and Astrok link

Hi all

this could be a final sign off for webwilly although I have linked it through with astok in hope that once my hbl email is dicontinued I can blog on time will tell.

Im off to WebBrighton maybe a new blog here?!

Anyway thanks to any and all who have visited this blog in the past

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Worth a read


Building the home theatre of your dreams
ROD EASDOWN
November 25, 2009



Setting up the home theatre of your dreams takes time, money and patience but you'll never regret it.

My mate Neil began lusting after a plasma screen as soon as he heard about them 10 years ago. The stumbling block was always his wife, who couldn't see the point of spending all that money on a big screen when they already had a perfectly good television.

Through the years the prices of plasmas plummeted but Neil's requests to buy one were always met with his wife's standard rebuttal: they're too expensive.

Then, on a one-week visit to New Zealand, Neil happened to buy the right lotto ticket and came home $NZ200,000 ($160,400) richer. The first thing he did was throw away his return ticket on Jetstar to get a "proper" airline seat and the second was buy a plasma. His wife's standard objection was suddenly as empty as the old TV cabinet.

------------------------------------------------------------
Screen size - how big is big enough?
------------------------------------------------------------
The install - stuff you need to know
------------------------------------------------------------

Four days after it was installed I rang her to ask what she thought. "You can't drag me away from it," she said. "It's wonderful, simply wonderful."

Now this is not a one-off story. I know this because the same thing happened at our place. My partner couldn't see any point in cluttering up the wall with a big plasma when we had a perfectly good, if rather dated, 68-centimetre Sony. Right up until Pioneer lent me a road-test unit for a couple of weeks.

All went fine until the guys turned up to take it back. She was inconsolable. So, once again, I floated the idea of buying one and the response, in summary, was: "Yes. Oh yes, yes, yes!"

From my experience, therefore, by far the most difficult part of getting a home theatre is gaining the permission of the person with whom you share the house. And once this particular mountain has been climbed, you may be tempted to assume everything else is a doddle, to which I would respond: "No. Oh no, no, no!"

If you're going down the five-speaker-plus-subwoofer surround sound route - and why wouldn't you? - you first have to figure the best way to work all those speakers into your living room. Despite the many options here (satellite speakers, normal speakers, in-wall and in-ceiling speakers; you can even buy speakers disguised as rocks), it's a task fraught with difficulty, especially since you also have to find enough vacant wall for your large flat-panel screen.

At our place we had to ditch a cabinet and turn everything through 90 degrees to put the screen on a formerly useless free-standing wall, which presented a challenge so great the installer declared it impossible. Then his boss came out and told him how to do it.

Valuable lesson one: when an installer excavates a speaker cable channel up a single brick wall and into the ceiling, do check who is cleaning up. Otherwise it will be you.

Valuable lesson two: when an installer excavates, he does not concern himself with filling the channel back in. That's a job for a plasterer. So now you need a plasterer. After the plasterer you will need a painter.

Valuable lesson three: surprisingly few installers are licensed electricians. If you need an extra power point, your installer may not be able to assist. But what's another tradesman at this point?

Valuable lesson four: check that your installer is familiar with audio installations. Otherwise you may find the speaker cables he inserts are little better than electrical flex.

Once the cables are laid, you'd assume all that's between you and home cinema nirvana is hooking everything up. You're about to learn that nothing in home cinema is ever this easy and this is where it really pays to buy your equipment through a specialist supplier rather than what these specialists sniffily refer to as box shops.

Such people know one brand of amplifier goes all huffy when it's connected to another brand of DVD player. They know how to get around the decidedly perplexing set-up menu system of a variety of 7.1-channel receiver I hesitate to name for fear of being sued to Tokyo and back. They know that some flat-panel screens need far more ventilation than others and cannot be mounted over fireplaces.

After a jolly good laugh, they can even figure how to incorporate your old and much-loved laserdisc player in the system.

And, if they're any good, they'll keep coming back until your Blu-ray player's intermittent refusal to provide any sort of vision with its sound is sorted.

Valuable lesson five: deal with a local business; you'll be going back there a lot.

Installation cost me just over $1000 and, given the work required and the follow-up when all the glitches happened, it was worth every cent. My overall budget, however, proved a tad optimistic.

Observing my own first law of home cinema, I spent as much on the sound as on the vision. My magnificent 127-centimetre plasma cost $5000 and I spent that much again (maybe a little more) on speakers, amplifier and Blu-ray player.

Valuable lesson six: the free movies that come with some Blu-Ray players aren't worth a cracker.

I can't say how glad I am that I bought a sound system with genuine horsepower. The sound is sensational, especially from Blu-ray discs. Sure, there are lots of cheaper, one-brand surround sound systems available but their shortcomings are only revealed at home. One is that they often won't go loud enough and another is that they can sound pretty thin. It's a fact that the bulk of people buying their second home cinema spend vastly more on sound than they did first time around.

The marketing manager at importer Audio Products, Holger Pfeilmaier, has noticed this. "An increasing number of people are realising that a big screen is only part of a modern home cinema," he says. "The focus has started to shift to the other core ingredient - spectacular sound."

So $5k for the screen, $5k for the sound and 10 per cent again for the installation. Total $11,000. So how come I wound up spending more than $14,000? Well, things cropped up.

The Blu-ray player, for example. We tried three before we found one that didn't get emotional about the cabling of my system. I didn't like that one so I paid as much again to upgrade to a better-quality one that not only worked but gave a palpable improvement in both sound and vision quality.

I had to buy expensive HDMI cables because manufacturers never put them in the box, despite breathlessly declaring how many HDMI connections their product has. Should this be valuable lesson seven?

There was also the matter of my partner disliking the cabinet I'd picked and opting for something smaller (thereby doubling the number of speaker stands needed) and considerably more expensive. Which is valuable lesson eight: in all matters pertaining to aesthetics, your partner is right, you are wrong.

There was the painter and the plasterer, of course. And all that other unpredictable stuff, like the slab of beer for the painter when he went above and beyond the call, the surge protector the installer thought was a good idea and some neat conduits that look like skirting boards, which I didn't even know existed when I embarked on this odyssey.

My home cinema has now been up and running for a year, and flawlessly for the past 10 months. Valuable lesson nine: if you watch action movies late at night and have neighbours, you'll need to get some headphones.

I love, love it, love it. Even more importantly, so does my partner. And she'll love it even more when I get rid of that stack of remote controls cluttering the coffee table and replace them with a single smart remote that controls the lot.

Valuable lesson 10: No home cinema sounds as good as a happy partner.

What are your tips for

Source: smh.com.au