Apple CEO Steve Jobs briefly emerges from his medical leave to unveil the second-generation of the popular iPad in San Francisco.
Thinner than the iPhone 4
Available in Australia on March 25
San Francisco: Apple's chief executive Steve Jobs has taken the stage to unveil the iPad 2, the upgraded version of its market-leading tablet computer.
His appearance is a surprise given he announced he was taking medical leave in January as a result of pancratic cancer and a liver transplant.
He's back ... Steve Jobs has unveiled the iPad 2. Photo: Reuters
Jobs said the new iPad - which goes on sale in the US on March 11 and in Australia on March 25 - was an "all new design" with a new processor that would make the device twice as fast.
A new version of the Apple mobile operating system - iOS 4.3 - will also come out as a free update on March 11.
"The first thing is it's dramatically faster," he said, talking about the new dual core A5 processor. "It’s up to nine times faster on the graphics."
Steve Jobs says the new iPad 2 will be 33 per cent thinner. Photo: Getty Images
As expected, the iPad 2 comes with front and rear-facing cameras and a built-in gyro for advanced gaming.
The Apple CEO said the new iPad would be 33 per cent thinner - from 13.4mm to 8.8mm thick. He said that would make it thinner than the iPhone 4. The iPad 2 will also be lighter: 590 grams versus 680 grams.
He said the iPad 2 would come in two colours - black and white. "And we will be shipping white from day one," he quipped, a reference to the long-delayed white iPhone 4 which has been held back due to production issues.
Dressed in his usual black mock turtle neck and faded Levis, Jobs said the new iPad will go on sale at the same starting price. The base model iPad sells for $699 in Australia.
"We think 2011 is going to be the year of iPad 2," he said.
He also announced a swag of new apps, accessories from cables to multicoloured magnetised covers.
The Apple co-founder was in good form, poking fun at the competition. He said they had been "flummoxed" by the iPad and declared that this year would also be the year of the iPad "copycat".
Jobs said Apple had sold nearly 15 million iPads last year, generating $US9.5 billion in revenue in the nine months after its launch.
Jobs also announced that Apple had sold over 100 million books on the iPad's iBookstore.
He said the majority of Apple’s revenues now come from these post PC devices such as the iPad.
Apple turns 35 on April 1.
Among the other announcements are:
Apple has just shipped its 100 millionth iPhone
Apple has paid out a total of $US2 billion to app developers
There are now 200 million active iTunes accounts
Apple has sold over 100 million ebooks in nine months
Stephen Hutcheon is in San Francisco as a guest of Apple.
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Scary new world's uncertain Borders
Richard Flanagan
February 19, 2011
Book customers are being told to spend double the amount of vouchers for beleagured bookstores.
THE failure of Borders and Angus & Robertson has little to do with online selling and much to do with corporate stupidity and greed.
REDgroup Retail, the owner, was a typical early noughties business, created by a private equity firm, overly indebted, seeking to make up the growing difference between its mounting debt burden and its more humble income by using its businesses to fleece customers and suppliers.
Thus in 2007 came the unedifying and frankly disgusting attempt by Angus & Robertson, bearer of the oldest and one of the proudest names in the history of the Australian book trade, to charge small Australian publishers for simply stocking their books, demanding up to $20,000 to make up for their supposed reduced profitability.
While REDgroup's chairman, Steven Cain is now telling the federal government the company's failure is in part because of the government's decision not to open up the book market to parallel importation and thus, supposedly, cheaper books, that didn't stop the company routinely charging above recommended retail prices for its books. If it was worried about retail pricing, it wasn't reflected in its own pricing structure.
A&R's strategy was, I was told some years ago by one of their senior executives, to go to war with the publishers and win. They looked to retailers like Woolworths as their model, with their crushing of the suppliers and producers as the key to making more money.
Ugly as all this was and hubristic as it has proved, there is no comfort for anyone in the failure of the two chains. Together they are believed to represent about 20 per cent of Australian book retailing. The independent bookstores account for about another 20 per cent. Combined, they were the segment of book retailing in which many of the books that matter most to an Australian identity and culture were sold. It was also here that the books we think important to a larger idea of our world and ourselves - novels, essays, poetry and histories - were sold.
Publishers needed that critical mass to push many books that otherwise might have been dubious commercially over the red line into a small profit. It meant a first novel, a history, a book of essays might just be able to sell 3000 copies. But with Borders and Angus & Robertson in voluntary administration, with the independents struggling and more and more closing, those days are perhaps gone. Many small publishers we have come to see as vital - Text, Black Inc, MUP to name a few - must be looking today at their future publishing schedules with very heavy hearts, wondering how on earth they can continue to make it all work.
Many large publishers will continue the process already begun of sacking staff and slashing their Australian lists, telling authors that despite their promise or their record that the market has vanished. To survive they will concentrate ever more on the books stocked by the discount department stores - Kmart, Big W and the like: celebrity titles, overseas mass-market hits, cookbooks. Here today and gone tomorrow books, ephemera, massively discounted by the department stores, sometimes below cost, as loss leaders that might drag the punter into the shop to make some other more profitable purchase.
It is of course a perfect storm - the ineptitude of a major player in REDgroup, the global financial crisis that slowed retail, a society increasingly besotted by price rather than value, the refusal of the government to either get rid of the GST on books or charge it on online purchases, the rise of e-books and the growth of online selling at the moment the Australian dollar reached record highs.
But as well as the high Aussie, there are other reasons why books are now cheaper overseas. One is that they are so heavily discounted by publishers to players such as Amazon in Britain and the US that many writers there now, in effect, receive only a 3 to 4 per cent royalty on their books, as opposed to 10 per cent in Australia. And because our books may well have to end up at a comparable price to that available online, it may be that a similar royalty ends up applying here.
In Australia, where 20,000 sales is a bestseller, the maths on 4 per cent of an average UK-US price of $14 is sobering - $11,200 for two or three years' work. That is, if you get published. The maths is little better for the indie stores and small publishers whose fate may be as bleak as that of many writers. It becomes a volume game for big publishers and a handful of big retailers.
Some, increasingly more, books that should be published won't be. Some writers will give up. Some that need nurturing will never get a chance. Many good books will never be. In the great halls of Big W and Target you will still be able to buy the latest self-help book or cookbook, or the memoir of an English TV celebrity.
Those who think it's about infinite choice will drag the cursor a few centimetres onto the shopping cart and click on the new Franzen or McEwan, and think that's all there is and that's how it is, and we will once more be lulled into thinking it all happens anywhere else but here.
Some years ago I spent a few weeks in the great suburban swirl that is the Golden Corridor between Brisbane and the Gold Coast, where bush vanishes and suburbs seem to rise in the space of a weekend. As I drove down a new freeway, I saw a koala trying to cross from one new suburb to another construction zone, little knowing that there was no bush left anywhere for it to live.
The position of Australian writers, publishers and booksellers is not dissimilar. Disoriented, confused, hoping to get across the new super-highway before the next B-double wipes them out. I hope we make it, but to where and what, no one can say.
Wikipedia turns 10 today, and while it has its critics, the online collaborative encyclopedia is one of the world's top websites, with no plans to go commercial.
BILLIONAIRE retailer Gerry Harvey has been in the news a bit lately. And as federal minister Mark Arbib knows from experience, if you're in the headlines, chances are you're also getting a Wikipedia workout. So while the Harvey Norman co-founder was acting as spokesman for a coalition of retailers trying to pressure the federal government to tax overseas online sales under $1000, someone, somewhere was editing Harvey's Wikipedia entry.
''Gerry Harvey has recently called any person buying online un-Australian,'' began the contributor this month. ''Yet he has failed to provide quality customer service and has not passed on the savings of the high Australian dollar. Basically becoming a billionare [sic] who would rather turn on his fellow countrymen than provide quality service!''
Advertisement: Story continues below
The only part of that paragraph to survive into this week was the un-Australian line. The rest of the rant was removed.
This, says John Lenarcic, RMIT's information technology lecturer and social media commentator, is the website's strength. An example of why the free, collaborative, online encyclopaedia - which turns 10 today - works.
In the decade since the site was launched by American co-founders Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia has remained true to its original altruistic goals: to create an open, global, non-commercial online encyclopaedia.
''That's one of the stellar achievements of the site,'' Lenarcic says. ''It's opened up knowledge to the world and allowed people to contribute to this vast body of knowledge.''
Wales, who still dabbles in a bit of editing, believes the site's global growth is limited only by literacy rates and internet access.
The wiki software was created six years before the website's launch, but Wales says applying it to an encyclopaedia was ''the real innovation''. That it worked was not a surprise, but he says the scale of today's ever-expanding site was. ''It's evolved pretty much the way I thought it would, but it's much bigger than I ever imagined.''
What began life as a single, English-language edition has ballooned to more than 250 languages, including Greenlandic, which is spoken by only 57,000 people. That edition recently passed the 1000 milestone for number of entries.
English is the dominant language but makes up less than 20 per cent of the total. There are more than a million articles each for French and German speakers and more than half a million each for several other languages, including Chinese and Japanese. But there is always room for more. A new language can be added by users creating a ''test wiki'' to prove there is enough demand.
The site has its critics, among them co-founder Larry Sanger, who left in 2002 and has since lamented the site's ''lack of respect'' for expertise, which, he says, exposes it to questions of credibility. However, the number of hits alone indicates the resource has become a regular point of reference.
According to web information company Alexa, Wikipedia is ranked the seventh most-used website in the world, with about 300 million page views each day. And despite the success - not to mention the potential dollars that could be milked from that - co-founder Jimmy Wales is adamant the site, which costs millions a year to run, will not accept advertising. Ever.
''We have no plans to do that,'' he says. ''It's just not who we are.''
Instead the site will continue to rely on yearly fund drives, which bring in millions of dollars, cobbled together from average donations of little more than $A40 a pop.
The potential worth of the website, which this year will open an Indian office, its first outside America, can only be guessed at. But to put things in context, the site sitting one spot above Wikipedia in the global popularity stakes is that of Chinese web services company Baidu, which includes Baidu Baike, an online collaboratively built encyclopedia. In 2009, revenue generated by the company was US$651 million.
But a commercial approach is not for Wales. He believes Wikipedia has become a core part of the globe's ''information infrastructure'' and he is not about to compromise that by going commercial. ''We prefer to have broad community support, which has worked for us in the past and we want to maintain that,'' he says.
The site, owned by non-profit organisation Wikimedia Foundation, has only 50 paid positions, most of them technology-based roles such as programmers and operations staff. The bulk of the manpower is supplied by a global community of volunteers. More than 91,000 active contributors work on more than 17 million articles in more than 270 languages.
But what of the accuracy and credibility of the site, which must surely inform its success? Lenarcic believes users should view Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia of popular culture - best consumed with a pinch of salt. This plays out in the stats, with Facebook, John Lennon, sex and YouTube the top queries driving traffic, according to Alexa. Searchers don't linger for long, spending about five minutes on a visit to the site and 59 seconds for a page view.
It's not what you'd call in-depth research, but the site doesn't pretend to be the authority. Like many other articles, the Gerry Harvey entry carries an eye-catching banner warning readers that it ''needs additional citations for verification''.
Last December, Labor powerbroker Mark Arbib's page was edited following WikiLeaks revelations that he was in regular contact with US diplomats. The news prompted descriptions of him as ''CIA agent, US mole, traitor, and US embassy hero'' to be added to his Wikipedia entry, at the expense of his portfolios. Arbib's page was altered 18 times over six hours before moderators reverted the page because of ''vandalism by multiple editors''.
The media interest passed and the page has not been modified since December 19.
''Wikipedia is self-correcting and if enough people see that article and flag an anomaly, somebody will change it,'' Lenarcic says. ''If something is open like Wikipedia then there is vigilance.''
However, its strength as an open site can also be its weakness.
''It's not subject to the same editorial process that other publications are bound by,'' Lenarcic says.
The most common gripe is a lack of academic vigilance, a claim that makes Adam Jenkins jump to Wikipedia's defence. A lecturer in information systems at the University of South Australia, Jenkins is also a regular editor of the site and vice-president of Wikimedia Australia, the Australian chapter of the organisation. ''There will always be problems there, but the reality is that there are a great number of experts on Wikipedia,'' he says.
Jenkins estimates that up to 90 per cent of editors who work on complex topics such as mass and formal logic would describe themselves as experts.
''The accuracy comes into play on those complex areas but when you come to ones like society and culture, then we're probably talking 50 per cent of editors who would describe themselves as experts,'' he says.
Jenkins, who is organising a ''meet-up'' at an Adelaide cafe today to mark Wikipedia's first decade, started editing three years ago because he found the concept interesting.
''It's not the topic that concerns me, it's the research. I'm an academic and you live for that stuff.''
He researches within his area of expertise but also edits content beyond that, such as the history of the Australian Capital Territory and cane toads. ''In Wikipedia, everyone's equal,'' he says. He is more than happy for others to edit and expand his work and agrees with Lenarcic that entries are best thought of as providing an overview of a subject. ''You can then follow the links and track down the sources and develop your own picture from there, which is what I recommend students do because it works really nicely.''
Has this search for a quick, easy, digestible overview changed or compromised the way we research? While fans praise the site for its global, collaborative structure and staunch determination to remain non-commercial, critics warn that it risks mixing facts with popular opinion. But whichever side of the online fence you favour, the site has undoubtedly changed the way information is shared, compared and reviewed.
That the website is so often a port of call for frustrated people reflects the position it occupies in contemporary society. Gerry Harvey is a case in point.
''If Wikipedia didn't exist, what could people do?'' Lenarcic asks. ''They could probably go and deface a Harvey Norman store. But these online sites have changed things. Graffiti now is largely purposeless; it's just tagging without any kind of commentary or opinion. That social commentary aspect of graffiti is being subsumed in the digital form through blogging or sites like Wikipedia.''
FOXTEL, iPads, areas that allow teenagers to listen to music and conference rooms open until 11pm - libraries are evolving into one of the coolest places for kids to hang out.
Hi-tech features are increasingly being added to attract teenagers once reluctant to frequent services with a reputation of being quiet and boring.
At the forefront of the innovation is the Campbelltown Library at Newton, which includes a "magic tree" that uses audio and visual technology to create effects from starry nights to bright pink ripples and sounds like birds singing as children read.
An outdoor reading area is another recent feature.
Library services manager Ursula Hickey said the north-eastern suburbs book hub had grown in popularity, especially among teens, since the new look was unveiled in September.
"Teenagers can be noisy, they can watch Foxtel and listen to music or they can sit quietly and study," she said. "It's the type of thing a lot of libraries are making small moves towards."
Architecture firm DesignInc Adelaide managing director Richard Stafford, whose business created the new look at Newton, said bookstore cafes have had a significant influence on the change in community libraries.
"There was a time when you couldn't eat or talk in libraries and now you can do both," he said.
Sam Jonas, 15, liked a library where you could "make a bit of noise".
"I usually go to do research for school projects, but I think it's cool you can use technology and not be scared to make a little bit of noise."
The iPad's role in saving newspapers is far from certain ANDREA CARSON June 9, 2010
It may make delivery easier, but a different partnership is needed for quality stories.
THE young man with a new iPad sat in a city cafe, sipping a short black as he swiped electronic pages, seemingly effortlessly. A dozen or so of us gazed at him through the cafe window. And why not? This machine is many things: lightweight, clever, portable and - having outpaced the iPhone with 2 million sales worldwide in two months - also popular. But will this tablet technology be the miracle panacea for the uncertain future newspapers face?
Newspapers are expensive to own and run. The ''rivers of gold'' advertising revenue of the heady 1980s have slowed as new online tributaries compete for market share. Today, any popular online site can attract advertising. As competition watchdog chief Graeme Samuel can testify, healthy competition drops prices. Advertising rates are no exception.
This paper's technology editor, Gordon Farrer, is optimistic the iPad will provide the ''smart interface'', backed by a company's track record, to get consumers to pay for content. But writing online, Eric Beecher - whose long newspaper experience includes writing, editing and publishing - says it is unclear how the iPad will create advertising revenue for newspapers.
The truth is it's hard to know who's right, because the iPad is an infant. Like all infants, it brings excitement, has wonderful potential, and has some growing up to do.
But it is a winner for Apple chief executive Steve Jobs's marketing team. Even though it has built the iPad without convenient modern features such as a USB port, camera, memory card, Adobe flash and multi-tasking capabilities, Apple has forced a deliberate market space for the new device. It has ensured consumers ''need'' a laptop, an iPhone, an iPod and now an iPad. Why merge functions when you can sell more products?
This model is perhaps a precursor to a better servant for newspapers, but not yet. Salvation waits.
Here are some facts about newspapers:
■The internet is barely a teenager. Western newspaper readership decline began before the internet became a word in the dictionary.
■British research shows quality newspapers have lost fewer readers relative to their circulations than tabloids.
■Quality journalism builds public trust. US media doyen Philip Meyer asserts democracy is strongest when several conditions are met, including survival of ''quality'' newspapers. This is supported by studies showing a positive correlation between healthy democracies and hard-copy newspapers. Meyer says the internet serves democracy as a distributor of information rather than an originator.
■Research shows that online newspaper content is less diverse and more entertainment focused than its print equivalents. Content converges when a medium relies solely on advertising revenue rather than a mix of sources.
For journalism to serve democracy, it seems clear that the content is of most importance. With this in mind, the question is less about whether the iPad is the right delivery method and more about how to sponsor good journalism.
Relying on subscription-based online delivery is flawed because the modern trend is free, free, and free. Rupert Murdoch may think readers will pay for content, but that genie is out of the bottle. Also passe are family-owned newspapers. Moreover, public broadcasters provide a quality non-subscription alternative.
Only niche publications such as business mastheads can get away with charging for content because credible information is specific and not easily found free.
In the United States, quality journalism has been funded by philanthropy. The success story is ProPublica, which recently won a Pulitzer Prize for its investigative journalism. But a philanthropic model requires a steady flow of donations and goodwill. And there is a risk of perceived and actual conflicts of interest. Some Scandinavian and European governments subsidise newspapers. But seeing as we already have the excellent ABC, this seems indulgent.
A more effective model builds on this idea. Innovative partnerships such as a recent one between The Age and the ABC delivered a bigger audience and broader coverage of an important story about Securency, a Reserve Bank subsidiary, and allegations of corruption involving its polymer note contracts.
Time will tell if the iPad was a step in the right direction for delivering newspapers. But clever partnerships to pursue public interest journalism? That is cause for optimism.
Andrea Carson is working on a PhD on the role investigative journalism in broadsheet newspapers plays in a democracy.
Fog plan hits turbulence ANDREW HEASLEY June 5, 2010
MELBOURNE Airport is supposed to be ''fog-proof'' after a $17 million infrastructure upgrade but as this week's flight diversions showed, the planes and flight crew are not.
Not all of Australia's domestic aircraft fleet are equipped, or pilots trained, to make use of the airport's new low-visibility landing system.
On Thursday, fog caused havoc with airline schedules as several morning flights were unable to land at Melbourne and had to be diverted to Sydney or Adelaide.
Air Services Australia spokesman Matt Wardell said the system primarily benefited international arrivals, as modern long-haul planes had more sophisticated avionics in the cockpit and pilots were trained to use the Category 3 low-visibility Instrument Landing System (Cat-3).
''It's not practical or economical to mandate aircraft to be fitted with it because there are only a few airports Australia-wide that are affected by fog,'' Mr Wardell said.
Melbourne is the only Australian airport to have the system installed.
Mr Wardell said the system was used on Thursday for landings, allowing suitably equipped planes and trained crew to land safely while Melbourne was shrouded in fog.
All of Qantas's Airbuses and Boeing 747s, 767s and 737-800s are equipped with the ''Cat-3'' gear and its pilots trained in its use.
A spokesman said Qantas had 21 older 737s-400s and smaller aircraft flying domestically that were not equipped with Cat-3.
While Jetstar has the equipment on its Airbus fleet used here and abroad and its international pilots are trained in its use, its domestic-only pilots are not trained to use the system.
Tiger Airways and Virgin Blue's planes are not Cat-3 equipped, either, though Virgin is evaluating the technology for its next aircraft purchases.
The airlines said the reason the planes did not have the technology was that until two months ago no Australian airport had it either.
Despite downtown Melbourne looking grey all day yesterday from the ground up, airlines reported that flights were landing and leaving normally.
Five million ready to make Skype calls over 3G June 3, 2010 - 1:06PM
Nearly five million people have downloaded a Skype phone application launched on Sunday, allowing iPhone users to make Skype calls over mobile networks.
Before the launch of the application for use on high-speed third generation (3G) networks on May 30, consumers could only use Skype on their iPhone when they had access to Wi-Fi. Although some exclusive deals with operators in some countries, such as 3 Mobile in Australia, have allowed calls on the operator's network from different phones from time to time.
"We've had millions of downloads to date," Russ Shaw, Skype's general manager for mobile, told Reuters, referring to global iPhone users. "That's really positive."
A Skype spokeswoman said the number of downloads of the application was nearly five million by Wednesday morning US Eastern Time.
Shaw said the app saw a good mix of demand across Skype's three main operating regions: Europe, North America and Asia Pacific.
However, Skype faced a lot of complaints from web commentators after it also said on Sunday that it would start charging for 3G calls between Skype users next year.
This was seen as a big turnaround since the main reason Skype became popular was because Skype-to-Skype calls have always been free whether subscribers use it on their computer or their mobile phone.
Shaw said the company needs to start charging for the service so that it can fund the investments needed to ensure that the quality of 3G Skype calls stays high.
He declined to give specific details about pricing plans except to say that the service would still be competitive with rival services including traditional cellphone calls.
"We're not going to want to price ourselves out of the market," he said. "I can't ignore the fact that consumers (currently) use us for free."
Apple is expected to announce a new iPhone on June 7. Shaw said Skype would hope to support the next iPhone too but noted that he had no details about Apple's announcement. AT&T Inc is currently the exclusive US iPhone provider.
claiming fair dealing exceptions on this blog for all posts with rules S40, (being reseach or study), or S41 (being criticism and review), or S42 (reporting the news).
Posts
